In C++, when working with a `std::set` in a multithreaded environment, it is crucial to ensure thread safety. Unlike other containers, `std::set` provides an ordered collection of unique elements, but directly modifying it while iterating can lead to undefined behavior. To safely erase elements from a `std::set` while iterating, you can use an iterator that allows for safe modifications.
This example demonstrates how to remove elements from a `std::set` while iterating over it, using access to mutexes to manage thread safety properly.
// Example code for erasing elements from std::set in a multithreaded context
#include
#include
#include
#include
std::set mySet = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::mutex mtx;
void eraseElements(int valueToErase) {
std::lock_guard<:mutex> lock(mtx);
for (auto it = mySet.begin(); it != mySet.end(); ) {
if (*it == valueToErase) {
it = mySet.erase(it); // Erase and move to the next valid iterator
} else {
++it; // Move to the next element
}
}
}
int main() {
std::thread t1(eraseElements, 3);
std::thread t2(eraseElements, 5);
t1.join();
t2.join();
for (int num : mySet) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?