When dealing with large datasets in C++, using `std::set` can be challenging, especially when you want to erase elements while iterating through the set. It's crucial to ensure that the iterator remains valid after an erase operation. Below is an example illustrating the correct way to erase elements from a `std::set` while iterating over it.
#include
#include
int main() {
std::set mySet = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
for (auto it = mySet.begin(); it != mySet.end(); ) {
if (*it % 2 == 0) { // Check if the element is even
it = mySet.erase(it); // Erase returns the next iterator
} else {
++it; // Move to the next element
}
}
// Print remaining elements
std::cout << "Remaining elements: ";
for (const auto& element : mySet) {
std::cout << element << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?