When working with std::map
in C++, it's crucial to manage performance effectively, especially when modifying the map while iterating over its elements. The std::map
container provides a convenient way to store key-value pairs, but directly erasing elements during iteration can lead to issues such as invalidating iterators. To maintain performance and avoid potential pitfalls, we can use a safe iteration technique.
// Example of safely erasing elements from std::map while iterating
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
int main() {
std::map myMap;
// Populating the map
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
myMap[i] = i * 10;
}
// Iterating and erasing elements
for (auto it = myMap.begin(); it != myMap.end(); ) {
if (it->second > 50) { // Example condition to erase elements
it = myMap.erase(it); // Erase returns the next iterator
} else {
++it; // Only increment if not erasing
}
}
// Print remaining elements
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?