When working with large datasets in C++, managing memory and data efficiently is crucial. This becomes especially important when you need to erase elements from a `std::deque` while iterating over it. A common approach to safely remove elements during iteration is to use an iterator that allows for safe modifications.
Here's an example that demonstrates how to remove elements from a `std::deque` while iterating through it:
#include <deque>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
int main() {
std::deque<int> dq = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10};
// Use an iterator to safely erase elements while iterating
for (auto it = dq.begin(); it != dq.end(); ) {
if (*it % 2 == 0) { // Remove even numbers
it = dq.erase(it); // Erase returns the next iterator
} else {
++it; // Only increment if not erasing
}
}
// Output remaining elements
for (const auto& num : dq) {
std::cout << num << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?