In designing APIs for ABI (Application Binary Interface) stability, particularly for financial applications, it's essential to focus on a few key principles. ABI stability ensures that changes or updates to the API do not break existing applications. This is critical in financial applications where reliability and consistency are paramount.
ABI stability, financial APIs, API design, application binary interface, reliability, consistency, financial applications
// Example of designing a stable API
class FinancialAPI {
protected $version = "1.0";
// A method to retrieve account balance
public function getAccountBalance($accountId) {
// Implementation goes here
return 1000.00; // Static value for example
}
// A new way of fetching transactions introduced in version 1.1
// This method preserves ABI by keeping previous methods intact
public function getTransactions($accountId, $startDate, $endDate) {
// Implementation goes here
return [
['date' => '2023-10-01', 'amount' => -100.00],
['date' => '2023-10-02', 'amount' => 500.00]
];
}
}
// Example usage
$api = new FinancialAPI();
echo $api->getAccountBalance(12345);
$transactions = $api->getTransactions(12345, '2023-10-01', '2023-10-31');
print_r($transactions);
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?