In C++, the `std::priority_queue` does not provide an option to customize the hashing and equality checks directly because it is intended for maintaining a collection of elements based on priority rather than performing hashing or equality checks. However, you can customize its behavior to some extent by providing your own comparison function or functor.
When you want to customize the ordering of elements in a priority queue, you can use a comparator that defines how two elements are compared to determine their priority.
Here’s an example of customizing a priority queue using a custom comparator:
#include
#include
#include
// Custom comparator for the priority queue
struct CustomComparator {
bool operator()(const int &lhs, const int &rhs) {
// Prioritize larger integers
return lhs < rhs;
}
};
int main() {
// Create a priority queue with the custom comparator
std::priority_queue, CustomComparator> pq;
// Insert elements into the priority queue
pq.push(10);
pq.push(30);
pq.push(20);
// Output elements based on priority
while (!pq.empty()) {
std::cout << pq.top() << " ";
pq.pop();
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?