In C++, composing async operations with `when_all` and `when_any` can be effectively achieved using coroutines. This allows you to manage multiple asynchronous tasks simultaneously. This technique is useful for scenarios where you want to wait for multiple operations to complete before proceeding. Below is an example demonstrating how to use `when_all` and `when_any` with coroutines.
#include <iostream>
#include <future>
#include <coroutine>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
// Simulated asynchronous task
std::future<int> async_task(int id, int duration) {
return std::async(std::launch::async, [id, duration]() {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(duration));
return id * 10;
});
}
// when_all implementation
template <typename... Futures>
auto when_all(Futures... futures) {
return std::make_tuple(std::move(futures)...);
}
// Example usage of async operations
int main() {
auto tasks = when_all(async_task(1, 2), async_task(2, 3), async_task(3, 1));
// Example of waiting for tasks to finish
std::apply([](auto&&... futures) {
((std::cout << futures.get() << " "), ...);
}, tasks);
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?