When compiling C++ code, selecting the right optimization flags can significantly impact the performance of your application. The most commonly used optimization flags include -O2
, -O3
, and -Ofast
. Each of these flags optimizes the code differently and is suited for various use cases.
The -O2
flag enables a good level of optimization without compromising compilation speed and code size. It performs a range of optimizations, including inline functions and dead code elimination, making it suitable for most production applications.
The -O3
flag turns on even more optimizations than -O2
, focusing on performance improvement. This includes more aggressive inlining and loop unrolling. However, it may increase the binary size and compilation time significantly, so usage depends on the application's requirements for speed versus size.
The -Ofast
flag goes a step further, enabling optimizations that may violate strict standards compliance (like IEEE floating-point rules). Use it when performance is a top priority, and you can afford to sacrifice portability or correctness in certain scenarios.
To choose the best optimization flag for your project, consider the following:
-O3
or -Ofast
is the way to go.-O2
might be more appropriate.-O0
during development for faster compilation and easier debugging before switching to higher optimization levels for production.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?