When working with C++ Standard Library containers, iterator invalidation can be a significant concern. However, using `std::span` can help you manage a lightweight view over a contiguous sequence without the risk of iterator invalidation that you would face with some collections. This is particularly useful when you need to provide a view over an array or a vector without modifying the underlying storage.
Here's how you can avoid iterator invalidation using `std::span`:
#include
#include
#include
void processSpan(std::span spans) {
for (int element : spans) {
std::cout << element << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}
int main() {
std::vector vec = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
std::span spn(vec.data(), vec.size()); // Create a span
processSpan(spn); // Pass the span to a function
// Even if we modify the original vector later, the span itself remains valid
vec.push_back(6);
// Note: We'd need to create a new span if we want to include the new element
std::span newSpn(vec.data(), vec.size());
processSpan(newSpn);
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?