In C++, the `std::priority_queue` container does not invalidate iterators on its elements because it does not expose iterators directly. However, if you want to manage elements directly and avoid iterators from being invalidated during operations, it's important to understand how to manipulate the elements correctly. Below are methods and practices to avoid iterator invalidation within a priority queue.
When creating a priority queue backed by a std::vector
, remember that operations like push and pop might not invalidate pointers or references to other elements within the vector. To ensure safe handling of elements, use the following approach:
#include
#include
#include
int main() {
std::priority_queue pq;
// Adding elements to the priority queue
pq.push(10);
pq.push(20);
pq.push(5);
// Accessing the top element
std::cout << "Top element: " << pq.top() << std::endl; // Outputs 20
// Example of removal
pq.pop();
std::cout << "New top element after pop: " << pq.top() << std::endl; // Outputs 10
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?