When working with std::map
in C++, iterator invalidation can be a significant issue, especially when modifying the map while iterating through it. To avoid iterator invalidation, consider the following strategies:
std::map::erase()
carefully: When you erase an element, it invalidates only the iterator pointing to that element, so ensure you store the next iterator before erasing.std::map::find()
to get iterators safely: Instead of erasing while iterating, you can use temporary iterators to mark elements for removal after the loop.Here’s an example of safely erasing elements while iterating through a std::map
:
#include <iostream>
#include <map>
int main() {
std::map myMap = { {1, "apple"}, {2, "banana"}, {3, "cherry"} };
for (auto it = myMap.begin(); it != myMap.end(); ) {
if (it->first % 2 == 0) {
it = myMap.erase(it); // Safe to erase and get next iterator
} else {
++it; // Move to the next element
}
}
for (const auto& pair : myMap) {
std::cout << pair.first << ": " << pair.second << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?