In C++, iterators can become invalid due to operations that modify the container they point to. When working with `std::deque`, it is important to be cautious of operations that can lead to iterator invalidation.
To avoid iterator invalidation with `std::deque`, prefer to use member functions that modify elements in place, and be mindful of operations that change the size of the deque.
Here are some tips to keep in mind:
Below is an example demonstrating how to safely iterate and modify a `std::deque`:
// C++ Example Code
#include
#include
int main() {
std::deque myDeque = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < myDeque.size(); ++i) {
// Modify elements while avoiding iterator invalidation
myDeque[i] *= 2; // Safe to modify via index
}
// Output modified deque
for (const int& value : myDeque) {
std::cout << value << " ";
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?