In C++, handling errors without using exceptions can be done effectively with mechanisms such as return values or using types like `std::pair`. This helps to avoid the overhead associated with exceptions and allows for more predictable error handling.
Instead of throwing exceptions, you can use `std::pair` to return a result along with a status indicator. The first element of the pair can represent the result, while the second element can represent the error status.
Here is an example of using `std::pair` to handle errors without exceptions:
#include
#include // for std::pair
#include
std::pair divide(int numerator, int denominator) {
if (denominator == 0) {
return {0, "Error: Division by zero"};
}
return {numerator / denominator, ""}; // No error
}
int main() {
int numerator = 10;
int denominator = 0;
auto [result, error] = divide(numerator, denominator);
if (!error.empty()) {
std::cout << error << std::endl;
} else {
std::cout << "Result: " << result << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?