In C++, exceptions can sometimes be a source of inefficiency or uncertainty in program flow. Using `std::optional` is a great way to handle situations where a value may or may not be present without throwing exceptions. Here’s how to manage errors effectively with `std::optional`.
`std::optional` allows you to represent a value that might be absent, making it a cleaner alternative to traditional error handling methods. Here’s an example:
#include <iostream>
#include <optional>
std::optional safe_divide(int numerator, int denominator) {
if (denominator == 0) {
return std::nullopt; // Return an empty optional
}
return numerator / denominator; // Return the result wrapped in optional
}
int main() {
auto result = safe_divide(10, 0);
if (result) {
std::cout << "Result: " << *result << std::endl; // Use * to access value
} else {
std::cout << "Division by zero error!" << std::endl; // Handle the error
}
return 0;
}
In this example, we define a function `safe_divide` that returns an `std::optional
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?