Fuzz testing, often referred to as fuzzing, is a software testing technique that involves providing invalid, unexpected, or random data as inputs to a program. The goal is to discover vulnerabilities and bugs that could cause the application to crash or behave unexpectedly. In C++, fuzz testing can be effectively applied by using various libraries and tools that generate random inputs to test your code.
Here's a basic example of how you might implement fuzz testing for a simple function in C++. This example shows how to use a fuzzing framework to test a function that processes input strings.
#include
#include
#include
// Function to be tested
void processInput(const std::string &input) {
if (input.empty()) {
throw std::invalid_argument("Input cannot be empty");
}
// Process the input
std::cout << "Processing: " << input << std::endl;
}
// Fuzzer function
void fuzzTest() {
const std::string inputs[] = {"valid", "", " ", "random input", "another test"};
for (const auto& input : inputs) {
try {
processInput(input);
} catch (const std::exception &e) {
std::cout << "Exception caught: " << e.what() << std::endl;
}
}
}
int main() {
fuzzTest();
return 0;
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?