In C#, the == operator is used to compare two operands for equality, while the Object.Equals() method is used to determine whether two object references refer to the same instance or whether their values are equivalent. The == operator can be overloaded by the types being compared, whereas Equals() is a method that has a defined behavior for reference types.
For example, when comparing value types, == typically checks for value equality, while for reference types it checks for reference equality unless overridden.
Here’s a simple comparison between using == and Equals():
// Example code in C#
int a = 5;
int b = 5;
// Using ==
if (a == b)
{
Console.WriteLine("a is equal to b using == operator.");
}
// Using Equals
if (a.Equals(b))
{
Console.WriteLine("a is equal to b using Equals method.");
}
// For reference types
string str1 = "hello";
string str2 = new string(new char[] { 'h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o' });
// Using ==
if (str1 == str2)
{
Console.WriteLine("str1 is equal to str2 using == operator.");
}
// Using Equals
if (str1.Equals(str2))
{
Console.WriteLine("str1 is equal to str2 using Equals method.");
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?