Handling threading issues such as deadlocks in C# involves careful design and understanding of synchronization mechanisms. To prevent deadlocks, you can use various strategies like proper ordering of locks, avoiding nested locks, using timeout mechanisms, and leveraging higher-level abstractions such as the Task Parallel Library (TPL).
Below is a simple example demonstrating how to avoid a deadlock scenario using a timed lock approach:
using System;
using System.Threading;
class Program
{
static object lock1 = new object();
static object lock2 = new object();
static void Main()
{
Thread thread1 = new Thread(() => { LockResources(lock1, lock2); });
Thread thread2 = new Thread(() => { LockResources(lock2, lock1); });
thread1.Start();
thread2.Start();
thread1.Join();
thread2.Join();
}
static void LockResources(object lockA, object lockB)
{
bool gotLockA = false;
bool gotLockB = false;
try
{
Monitor.TryEnter(lockA, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1), ref gotLockA);
Monitor.TryEnter(lockB, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1), ref gotLockB);
if (gotLockA && gotLockB)
{
// Critical section
Console.WriteLine("Locks acquired!");
}
}
finally
{
if (gotLockA) Monitor.Exit(lockA);
if (gotLockB) Monitor.Exit(lockB);
}
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?