Testing Fragments in Android can be achieved using various methodologies such as unit tests, instrumentation tests, and UI tests. The Android Testing Support Library provides tools like JUnit, Espresso, and Mockito that help to create effective tests for Fragments.
Here is an example of how to test a simple Fragment using Robolectric and JUnit:
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
import android.os.Bundle;
import androidx.fragment.app.Fragment;
import androidx.test.core.app.ApplicationProvider;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
public class MyFragmentTest {
private MyFragment fragment;
@Before
public void setUp() {
fragment = new MyFragment();
Bundle bundle = new Bundle();
fragment.setArguments(bundle);
// Setup Fragment using FragmentManager if necessary
}
@Test
public void testFragmentNotNull() {
assertNotNull("Fragment is null", fragment);
}
@Test
public void testFragmentArguments() {
Bundle args = fragment.getArguments();
assertNotNull("Fragment arguments are null", args);
// Add more assertions based on expected arguments
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?